<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Konstantinos Besios Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kbesios.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kbesios.com/blog</link>
	<description>My blog about photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 05:45:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Large format at the beach by kbesios</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/05/11/large-format-at-the-beach/#comment-7494</link>
		<dc:creator>kbesios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 05:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=9211#comment-7494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the suggestion. The Chamonix would be my first choice as a field camera, I&#039;ve read excellent reviews.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the suggestion. The Chamonix would be my first choice as a field camera, I&#8217;ve read excellent reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Large format at the beach by Angus</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/05/11/large-format-at-the-beach/#comment-7482</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=9211#comment-7482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you make the jump to field camera may I recommend the Chamonix 4x5 or its knock off Shen Hao PTB 4x5. There is a new version of the Chamonix with even greater movements. I hike with my Chamonix and set up is pretty fast and it is extremely light and can do up to 450mm lenses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you make the jump to field camera may I recommend the Chamonix 4&#215;5 or its knock off Shen Hao PTB 4&#215;5. There is a new version of the Chamonix with even greater movements. I hike with my Chamonix and set up is pretty fast and it is extremely light and can do up to 450mm lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Taking my first image with a 8&#215;10&#8243; pinhole camera by Filmguerilla</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/03/30/taking-my-first-image-with-a-8x10-pinhole-camera/#comment-7446</link>
		<dc:creator>Filmguerilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 02:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=7191#comment-7446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you very much!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Taking my first image with a 8&#215;10&#8243; pinhole camera by kbesios</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/03/30/taking-my-first-image-with-a-8x10-pinhole-camera/#comment-7440</link>
		<dc:creator>kbesios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=7191#comment-7440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tripod mounts (both of them) are sturdy. I haven&#039;t shot at windy conditions yet. Of course this is a very large hollow camera so I pull of the holder very carefully, then unscrew the hole cap and just before I remove it, I wait a few seconds just to be sure there are no vibrations. It sure vibrates more easily than a &quot;normal&quot; camera.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tripod mounts (both of them) are sturdy. I haven&#8217;t shot at windy conditions yet. Of course this is a very large hollow camera so I pull of the holder very carefully, then unscrew the hole cap and just before I remove it, I wait a few seconds just to be sure there are no vibrations. It sure vibrates more easily than a &#8220;normal&#8221; camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Taking my first image with a 8&#215;10&#8243; pinhole camera by Filmguerilla</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/03/30/taking-my-first-image-with-a-8x10-pinhole-camera/#comment-7439</link>
		<dc:creator>Filmguerilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=7191#comment-7439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi diane,

I will check his camera&#039;s on ebay. I hope it&#039;s affordable like this one. I had made my 8x10 pinhole with foamboard. It&#039;s nice but i like to get a sturdier one so i could use it anywhere. This one seems to be sturdier and could survive with different type of shooting condition. I did double checked the tripod mounts on this camera and for me It looked a bit flawed in the design? Is it sturdy kbesios? I wonder how it could  stand with a strong wind. I wonder if the tripod mounts is solid like the other tripod mounts that i saw on other wooden cams.. Those were attached very good on the body unlike this one.  I think i should ask the maker as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi diane,</p>
<p>I will check his camera&#8217;s on ebay. I hope it&#8217;s affordable like this one. I had made my 8&#215;10 pinhole with foamboard. It&#8217;s nice but i like to get a sturdier one so i could use it anywhere. This one seems to be sturdier and could survive with different type of shooting condition. I did double checked the tripod mounts on this camera and for me It looked a bit flawed in the design? Is it sturdy kbesios? I wonder how it could  stand with a strong wind. I wonder if the tripod mounts is solid like the other tripod mounts that i saw on other wooden cams.. Those were attached very good on the body unlike this one.  I think i should ask the maker as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waterfall by kbesios</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/05/04/waterfall-2/#comment-7412</link>
		<dc:creator>kbesios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=9173#comment-7412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t have any experience with the 617 back, but I have read good reviews on different forums, so its a viable option (for lenses between 90-150mm). I also had thought about the Fotoman 45PS but I preferred to purchase a view camera for my 4x5 shots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any experience with the 617 back, but I have read good reviews on different forums, so its a viable option (for lenses between 90-150mm). I also had thought about the Fotoman 45PS but I preferred to purchase a view camera for my 4&#215;5 shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waterfall by Angus</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/05/04/waterfall-2/#comment-7409</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=9173#comment-7409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still on the fence about getting a stand alone 617 camera or going for a 617 back for my 4x5 - like the Shen-Hao Art Panorama 617.  My latest addition coming in a week is the Fotoman 45SPS which is basically a fixed cone 4x5 with shift but no tilt or swing. A 617 back would work well with something like that but I don&#039;t think it would hang off the back of my light view camera very well! Any thoughts or observations?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still on the fence about getting a stand alone 617 camera or going for a 617 back for my 4&#215;5 &#8211; like the Shen-Hao Art Panorama 617.  My latest addition coming in a week is the Fotoman 45SPS which is basically a fixed cone 4&#215;5 with shift but no tilt or swing. A 617 back would work well with something like that but I don&#8217;t think it would hang off the back of my light view camera very well! Any thoughts or observations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waterfall by kbesios</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/05/04/waterfall-2/#comment-7399</link>
		<dc:creator>kbesios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 23:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=9173#comment-7399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its a Gaoersi back, very good construction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a Gaoersi back, very good construction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waterfall by Angus</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/05/04/waterfall-2/#comment-7395</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 22:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=9173#comment-7395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t fancy buying yet another lens and I have the smaller RF75 Lee system that maxes out at 67mm - so I think I&#039;d make do with the 90mm f8. The Fresnel would certainly help - I haven&#039;t had too much difficulty with my 4x5 and the 90mm f8 but then again I generally shoot in pretty bright light. As to the back you use, is a Gaoersi too? I can&#039;t imagine there are many affordable 6x17 backs out there!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t fancy buying yet another lens and I have the smaller RF75 Lee system that maxes out at 67mm &#8211; so I think I&#8217;d make do with the 90mm f8. The Fresnel would certainly help &#8211; I haven&#8217;t had too much difficulty with my 4&#215;5 and the 90mm f8 but then again I generally shoot in pretty bright light. As to the back you use, is a Gaoersi too? I can&#8217;t imagine there are many affordable 6&#215;17 backs out there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waterfall by kbesios</title>
		<link>http://kbesios.com/blog/2013/05/04/waterfall-2/#comment-7393</link>
		<dc:creator>kbesios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 21:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kbesios.com/blog/?p=9173#comment-7393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got my Gaoersi used and the previous owner had installed a fresnel on the ground glass back. Combined with the 90mm f/4.5 Nikkor, it  makes a very bright focusing screen which is a joy to use. I use the Nikkor f/8 with my view camera (no fresnel) and I really have difficulties  focusing in dim locations. 
Of course the f/8 is much smaller and the image quality is unbelievable. I use a LEE filters system, but there are many times that I appreciate the speed and convinience of just mounting a 67mm filter in the f/8 Nikkor if I only want to use a polarizer or ND filter. On the other hand, a 6x17 image can be benefited much from the use of ND Grads (especially with slide film which has a narrow dynamic range), so a future investment to the LEE or Cokin filters system could be worth the cost. I have found ND Grads to be invaluable in landscape shots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got my Gaoersi used and the previous owner had installed a fresnel on the ground glass back. Combined with the 90mm f/4.5 Nikkor, it  makes a very bright focusing screen which is a joy to use. I use the Nikkor f/8 with my view camera (no fresnel) and I really have difficulties  focusing in dim locations.<br />
Of course the f/8 is much smaller and the image quality is unbelievable. I use a LEE filters system, but there are many times that I appreciate the speed and convinience of just mounting a 67mm filter in the f/8 Nikkor if I only want to use a polarizer or ND filter. On the other hand, a 6&#215;17 image can be benefited much from the use of ND Grads (especially with slide film which has a narrow dynamic range), so a future investment to the LEE or Cokin filters system could be worth the cost. I have found ND Grads to be invaluable in landscape shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
